Conclusion Compared with PPH, STARR has a better long-term efficacy although its fee is higher and surgery time is longer.
The prevention and cure of complication in PPH operation
目的通過多中心臨牀研究進一步評價剪口結紮結合PPH術治療混合痔的有效*和安全*。
結論與PPH術相比,STARR術治療直腸前突雖然在手術住院費用和手術時間上有所增加,但遠期療效較好。
目的:探討吻合器痔上粘膜環切術(PPH)聯合電鉗外痔切除術治療重度痔的臨牀價值。