“syntax tree”簡單造句，syntax tree造句子

It suffices to say here that when this rule eventually runs, a target C++ operation will have been created already in the abstract syntax tree mentioned earlier.

You define a language by defining the structure of its abstract syntax tree, its abstract grammar.

The Erlang language (developed by Ericsson) USES a VM to execute Erlang bytecodes and also to interpret Erlang from the source's abstract syntax tree.

This time, you will fetch all of the import statements in the abstract syntax tree.

The syntax-aware reflow we use to wrap long lines is based on the parse trees (abstract syntax trees) for the language, and some other things need per-language customization.

Strictly speaking, the AST (abstract syntax tree) is also an IR (intermediate representation) - since it is not quite the source, and not quite the target language.

Third, with the syntax tree gone, the interpreter no longer needs to propagate execution state between syntax tree nodes.

I'll note before we go any further that the terms parse tree and abstract syntax tree (or AST) describe very similar grammatical structures.

A parse of a sentential form is the construction of a derivation and possibly a syntax tree for it.