It ultimately evaluates that line of code but just once the stuff inside the curly braces, but the semicolon on the end, essentially has the effect of this.
One thing that is worth noting: when you return a string of XML as your result set, you should surround the variables in your return string within curly braces.
Absolutely, by functions, but you can also create local scope with curly braces.
So again immediately on first glance, a little more arcane, there are some distracting details, these curly braces, the semicolon, the quotation marks.
The } (right curly brace) should begin a line and be indented to align with the beginning of the line containing the matching { (left curly brace).
As you can see, we can enclose the environment variable name in curly braces when it is not clearly separated from the surrounding text.
There should be one space between the ) (right parenthesis) and the { (left curly brace) that begins the statement body.
Similarly, if you are directly following a variable name with alphanumeric text, be sure also to enclose the variable name in curly braces () to distinguish it from the surrounding text.
It seems like the drab world of C-like, imperative, curly braces languages might be spiced up by a variety of paradigms.
If a method body has more than one expression, you must surround it with curly braces {...}. You can omit the braces if the method body has just one expression.
A route template looks similar to a URI path, but it can have placeholder values, indicated with curly braces.
Everything inside of the curly braces is the code I am writing.
國文精選館
