It is important for you as a requester of features to understand why you're asking for them.
This model is identical to the previous model, except that the requester adds a correlation id to the request message.
Simply put, full support of the SOAP specification by both the Service provider and the Service requester solves these problems and enables seamless interoperability.
If a change is made to any aspect of a service that is coupled, then either the requester or the provider application code (or, more likely, both) will have to change.
The requester sends the address information to the services provider who will then return the location information (longitude and latitude) back to the requester.
Response includes attribute assertions for those attributes for which the requester has permissions.
The idealized SOA is shown in Figure 1, where a requester interacts with a provider to achieve some business-relevant task.
This example does, however, show the decoupling of the service requester and provider, shown the continuity between Versions 6.0.1 and 6.02, and set the stage for our further discussion.
Means to invoke both, service provider and service requester.
The ESB pattern improves upon this basic SOA capability through its explicit management of requester-provider interactions.
The service requester and provider are not aware the messages are flowing through the ESB and know nothing about the routing or logging in the ESB.
In this article, we illustrate how to create the service requester-side artifacts, and we include the step-by-step methods needed to integrate the legacy services with a BPEL workflow process.
Caches on the service provider side or the service requester side are not applicable for this pattern.
If the request was a simple query request with no important side effects, then the requester could resend the message on a new connection (assuming one can be established).
Each software service can act as a service provider or requester.
This is a bit of a change for the requester because under normal WS-RM processing rules, once a message is acknowledged, it would not need to be resent.
In this model the ESB no longer fully trusts requesting applications and will require credentials to validate the identity of the requester.
What if, in the point-to-point interaction pattern between the requester and publisher mediation, the requester already uses a publish/subscribe interaction pattern, as shown in Figure 2?
Now if the requester_s system crashes at any time the requester will know where to restart by the records it keeps in its local database.
The artifact is sent only to the expected requester and is deleted after it is retrieved.
This queue is either known by both the requester and the responder, or the requester specifies in the request message where to send replies.
國文精選館
